This is an old revision of the document!
<UL>
<li>Other Instruments</li>
<li>Particle & CR Environment and Issues</li>
<table border=“1”>
<tr><td><b>Document Name+Link</b></td><td><b>Date</b></td><td><b>Type (1)</b></td><td><b>Author</b></td><td><b>Comment</b></td><td> <b>Keywords</b></td></tr>
<tr><td>Reference on Space Particle Environment stassinopoulos.pdf </td><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>stassinopoulos</td><td>Particle Background and Environment Data </td><td>Particle background, latitude, SAA, electron population, particle contours, high background region, map of radiation belts, van allen belts</td></tr>
<tr><td>Next Item </td><td>Next Date</td><td>Next Type</td><td>Next Author</td><td>Next Comment</td><td> Next Keywordt</td></tr>
</table>
<li>Cosmic Backgrounds</li> <UL>
<li>X-ray</li>
<li>The UV background is given in 1987AJ_____94__876O.pdf</li> <li> optical-IR</li> My favorite plot of space (zodiacal) background opt-NIR is the one by Michael Lampton (though I think aldering's analysis below is better:
I believe you can take as definitive Greg Aldering's analysis of space background for SNAP aldering01_space_zodi.pdf. DO NOT USE without attribution!!! (called the “white paper” elsewhere, probably a section of, or a study for the white paper; the original file was just called zodi.ps).
It is important to understand that the zodi varies depending on angle between sun and pointing. I *think* in the optical it doesn't vary so much, but don't quote me on that. </ul> </ul>