Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- public:bggrbinfo [2022/01/22 02:15]
bruce [SGRB]
+++ public:bggrbinfo [2023/09/12 12:04] (current)
bruce [X-rays]
@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 ^GRB^Comment^
 |080319b| **Prototype?** Naked Eye Burst, probably optically brightest, best optical light curve, proposed two-component jet (Racusin+08|
-|11025A|**Prototype?** Very long burst, optical correlates better with MeV than KeV (Guiriec+16)|
+|110205A|**Prototype?** Very long burst, optical correlates better with MeV than KeV (Guiriec+16)|
 |130427A|Largest E_ISO ever measured; 5.65e54  erg  (1 keV-10MeV); Fermi and Swift  -  Ref: GCN 14576 E_iso; Swift GCN 14448|
 |130603B| - short, Bright burst|
@@ Line 119: / Line 119: @@
 === Alternative Classifications to the Short vs. Long Classification Scheme: ===
+At the GRB50 meeting there was a lot of talk of long GRBs apparently with Knovae, longs with no SNe, etc.  So the distinction is not that clear.
+Here is a Girlanda paper asking if they are so different: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214404815000129
@@ Line 175: / Line 179: @@
 To understand the various spectral components and the theoretical slopes, please see the section on [[public:emission|Emission Mechanism Theory]].
-GRB 110205A: http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.0283 This paper looks like this burst 110205a might be one of the best observed ever, rivaling the Naked Eye Burst 080319B.
+==== GRB 110205A ====
+GRB 110205A was a 200 s duration GRB from z=2.2 that has really good data.
+http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.0283 This paper looks like this burst 110205a might be one of the best observed ever, rivaling the Naked Eye Burst 080319B. This paper claims it puts together multi-wavelength and makes FS+RS fit everything.
+==== GROND Prompt Measurement (but long delayed) ====
+Eliot+13  arXiv:1312.5099 is a conference paper NOT PEER-REVIEW PUBLISHED about GRB121217 which had a delayed episode 700 seconds later!!!  Who knows how applicable this is to regular GRB, who knows if this is totally bogus but...
+Listen to this incredibly useful summary from abstract, "Only in a handful of cases has it been possible obtain simultaneous coverage of the prompt emission in a multi-wavelength regime (gamma-ray to optical), as a result of: observing the field by chance prior to the GRB (e.g. 080319B/naked-eye burst), long-prompt emission (e.g., 080928, 110205A) or triggered on a pre-cursor (e.g., 041219A, 050820A, 061121). [...And to this they now add 121217]"
+==== Other Papers ====
+This oddly short little paper gives a kind of list of "all" prompt optical, and may be useful: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117710003972#
-Other Papers:  This oddly short little paper gives a kind of list of "all" prompt optical, and may be useful: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117710003972#
 BIggest collected study of prompt is Kopac+13 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/bib_query?arXiv:1305.6897, mostly ground-based.

Bruce GRB Wiki

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools