User Tools

Site Tools


main:grb_observing

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
main:grb_observing [2014/11/06 01:38]
bruce
main:grb_observing [2021/01/12 00:50] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Observing GRBs ====== ====== Observing GRBs ======
 +----
  
  
 +====== Space Backgrounds & Environment======
 +----
  
-====== X-ray Observations ====== 
  
 +===== Particle & CR Environment and Issues =====
  
  
 +^Document Name+Link^Date^Type^Author^Comment^Keywords^
 +|"World Maps of Constant B, L, and Flux Contours", E. G. Stassinopoulos, NASA SP-3054, Goddard Space Flight Center, 1970 {{:main:stassinopoulos_earth_mag_field_particles.pdf|stassinopoulos.pdf}} |1970|NASA Report|Stassinopoulos|Reference on Space Particle Environment|Particle background, latitude, SAA, electron population, particle contours, high background region, map of radiation belts, van allen belts, cutoff of rigidity,COR|
  
  
-Observing GRB in X-rays+===== Diffuse X-ray Background ===== 
-GRB and Background Basics+ 
 +===== Diffuse UV background ===== 
 + 
 + 
 + is given in [[Media:1987AJ_____94__876O.pdf]] 
 + 
 +===== Diffuse Optical-IR background ===== 
 + 
 +My favorite plot of space (zodiacal) background opt-NIR is the one by Michael Lampton (though I think aldering's analysis below is better:  
 + 
 +{{ :main:lampton_space_bgnd.png?direct&300 |lampton_space_bgnd.png}} 
 + 
 +I believe you can take as definitive Greg Aldering's analysis of space background for SNAP {{:main:aldering01_space_zodi.pdf|aldering01_space_zodi.pdf}} DO NOT USE without attribution!!! (called the "white paper" elsewhere, probably a section of, or a study for the white paper; the original file was just called zodi.ps).   
 + 
 +It is important to understand that the zodi varies depending on angle between sun and pointing.  I *think* in the optical it doesn't vary so much, but don't quote me on that.  
 +</ul> 
 +</ul> 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 +====== X-ray Observations ====== 
 +---- 
  
 ===== Spectral Slopes ===== ===== Spectral Slopes =====
Line 28: Line 55:
  
  
-====== X-ray Energy Band Selection ======+===== X-ray Energy Band Selection =====
  
  
Line 44: Line 71:
  
  
-======= How Far to Integrate Down in Energy ======++==== How Far to Integrate Down in Energy ====
  
  
-======= How far to integrate up in energy  =======+ 
 +==== How far to integrate up in energy  ====
  
  
Line 65: Line 93:
 Note that the SGRB are still rising at the highest energy while the LGRB is flattening. Note that the SGRB are still rising at the highest energy while the LGRB is flattening.
  
 +
 +----
 +
 +===== What about integrating down? =====
 +  
 +
 +How far down should one go in energy before this is not favorable increase in S/N? 
 +
 +{{ :main:observing_xbands:grb_intgd_down.png?direct&600 |}}  this from singu!~/projects/xethreshhi2lo.pro
 +
 +{{ :main:observing_xbands:grb_snr_intgd_down.png?direct&600 |}}
 +
 +So, its quite clear that you still get photons for BOTH spectra in this idealized picture.  I think even HETE got like one SGRB (don't quote me). 
  
  
  
 ====== Optical Observations ====== ====== Optical Observations ======
 +----
 +
 +
 +===== Lya Forest Spectroscopy =====
 + 
 +
 +Of interest because high-z grb may provide very bright light sources for very high-z Lyman Alpha Forests.
 +
 +
  
 +Some papers to check out some day: 
  
 +http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.1477v1      Observational Requirements for Lyman-alpha Forest Tomographic Mapping of Large-Scale Structure at z ~ 2
  
  
main/grb_observing.1415237900.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/01/12 00:50 (external edit)